SAN FRANCISCO (Vocus) June 1, 2010 — In this tough economic climate employers have a strong interest in limiting unnecessary time that an employee may be out of work for a short-term disability (STD). To better understand how to help employers reduce lost work time, wage replacements and lost productivity, the non-profit Integrated Benefits Institute (IBI) analyzed data from its 2008 benchmarking program on durations of STD claims and plan design for over 470,000 claims and released the findings and employer recommendations today.

A common method adopted by employers to manage potentially long-duration STD cases is to use an STD plan design that limits the maximum duration of paid benefits – a strategy that may have potential downsides. The analysis found that even for STD plan designs with eligibility periods as short as 13 weeks, most claims resolve well before benefits expire, and claims with different maximum durations had very similar median lost work days. These results suggest that the duration of benefits eligibility does not contribute greatly to the timing of an employee’s termination of benefits.

“Providing effective case management is the real issue employers should consider to promote successful return to work,” said Thomas Parry, PhD, IBI president. “Employers should work to prevent absences from becoming short-term disabilities and manage cases for successful return-to-work outcomes when they do become disabled. Such a total absence management approach includes implementing nurse case management and encouraging transitional employment. For employers with highly trained employees, this could be an especially valuable solution.”

By terminating benefits before full recovery from an illness or injury, an employee’s return to pre-disability performance levels may be delayed. A premature forced return to work could unnecessarily extend a period of presenteeism (under performance at work due to lingering illness or injury).

In addition, absent employees may not return to work at all because they either file a long-term disability claim, opt to seek employment elsewhere after recovery or join the unemployment rolls, putting further strain on public funds and, for many, instilling a disability mindset from which recovery may be difficult.

About the Integrated Benefits Institute
The Integrated Benefits Institute (IBI) provides employers and their supplier partners with resources for demonstrating the business value of health. As a pioneer, leader and nonprofit supplier of health and productivity research, measurement and benchmarking, IBI is a trusted source for benefits performance analysis, practical solutions, and forums for information and education. IBI’s programs, resources and expert networks advance understanding about the link between – and the impact of – health-related productivity on corporate America’s bottom line. For additional information visit: ibiweb.org.

# # #

For the original version on PRWeb visit: http://www.prweb.com/releases/2010/06/prweb4073214.htm

The state’s unemployment insurance system, which is almost broke due the high number of jobless people seeking claims, is scheduled to automatically jack up rates by 40 percent or more in January to help replenish its depleted coffers.

But the administration, which has been consulting with business groups, is eyeing a lower 20 percent increase in employer rates as a way to ease the burden on businesses during the recession, according to a memo sent to business groups by Suzanne Bump, Patrick’s secretary of labor and workforce development.

Read full story

Uwe Reinhardt’s recent commentary on CNN.com highlights the economic dangers that threaten the American middle class if efforts to reform the health-care system fail. Reinhardt, a political economy professor at Princeton University, made some very interesting points about the relationship between health insurance and employment in our country.

Reinhardt warns that without health-care reform, “Millions [of middle class Americans] will lose their employment-based insurance … and millions will find themselves inexorably priced out of health care as we know it.” He also points out that companies view health insurance as part of an employee’s compensation package — therefore when costs increase, this financial burden falls on the individual. He’s right. Without reform, many more Americans will find themselves unable to afford health insurance because of the rising costs of health care.

Case in point, a story published in The News & Observer pointed out that health insurance premiums in North Carolina have risen five times faster than salaries over the past decade. With unemployment high, it leads to the question — why is health insurance tied to employment in the first place? Part of the answer is that employment-based insurance in our country has long been based more in tradition than rationality. It was originally a perk — an enticement as part of a larger benefits package that employers offer to attract and retain high quality employees. Now, health insurance premiums are beyond the reach of what many individuals can afford by themselves, making employer sponsored group plans one logical gateway to coverage.

Read full story